Who else would support a campaign to kill all the remaining Pandas?

Or at the very least let the poor things die in peace. Its obvious mother nature doesn鈥檛 want them around. They eat virtually one thing on the planet. That one thing their digestive system can鈥檛 digest efficiently. Therefore they have to eat 30lbs or more of the stuff. They don鈥檛 even want to have sex anymore. We show them panda porn, and make them do panda sex exercises. Females can鈥檛 get pregnant but a few times in their lives, and when they do have more then one pup, they pick one and let the other(s) DIE!! Come on now, how far do we as humans have to go to keep these damn things alive.

I will happily eat Panda meat every day, sleep under a Panda skin blanket, wear Panda fur hats, and use a Panda foot ashtray if it means I never have to see another story about Pandas watching porn, or live helicopter coverage of UPS delivering a Panda to a zoo.

Who else would support a campaign to kill all the remaining Pandas?norten

Perhaps if humans hadn't destroyed so much of their habitat, they wouldn't be in trouble. They were doing just fine when all they had to deal with was nature.

Who else would support a campaign to kill all the remaining Pandas?panda

I think that they need to clone the Panda with a rabbit and let nature take over from there...
This is probably the oddest question I have ever read haha, I agree mother nature should take over but im not going to exploit the killing of a certain species
extinction is an integral part of the idea of evolution. It astounds me that people who will protest any suggestion that god had anything to do with creation will go to such great lengths to keep a species around that has obviously gone as far as it can evolutionarily. While it is one thing to allow a species to go extinct due to man damaging the environment, it is quite another to throw away resources on a species that has little survival potential due to its own genetic make up. While I do not think killing them is a very good idea, I do think that using the money we are spending on preserving the species could be better used to preserve wetlands, clean up waterways or some other similar project.
The Club of Rome has the same attitude towards you
I completely agree. why do we waste our time protecting any animals that give no benefit to society. If we cannot eat it or make it into anything usefull, then we do not need to waste money keeping these animals alive. I am not saying we need to kill these animals I believe we need to just let them die out naturally. If mother nature wants the animal to die what authority do we have to let him live?